SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
SuperintendentÕs Office
![]()
January
29, 2010
TO: All
Staff
FROM: Susan
M. Swartz
On January 11, 2010, I
presented a carry forward 2010Ð2011 budget to the Scotia-Glenville Board of
Education. On January 19, 2010,
Governor Paterson released his proposed New York State budget which includes a
5% reduction in school aid. As we
have worked to understand what the governorÕs proposal means to us as a district,
the need to provide you with accurate information about this situation has
become even more apparent.
Many of you have read or
heard information about the StateÕs fiscal challenges and how these issue are
impacting school districts.
2009Ð2010 aid to schools was ultimately ÔflatÕ, meaning we received the
same level of aid as we had in 2008Ð2009.
Initially, I had hoped aid would remain flat in 2010Ð2011 but, with the
release of the governorÕs budget, we are now aware of the proposed reduction.
In addition, the State
ÔborrowedÕ in excess of $390 million from last yearÕs American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA) allocation to help balance its budget. These federal funds were to be paid out
over a three-year period; in fact, $1.56 million of those dollars were used to flatten
school aid to Scotia-Glenville in the current yearÕs budget. Given borrowing against these Federal
dollars and the StateÕs precarious budget position, the district faces
significant challenges in developing next yearÕs budget. To complicate matters, the situation at
both the Federal and State level is far from being resolved and we will be
developing our budget with less than complete information.
We will continue to work to
control what we canÉ..which is the expenditure side of our budget. Furthermore, through our budget
development process we will continue to explore ways to provide quality
programs for our students at a cost which can be supported by our community.
This past Monday evening, I
spent part of the Board of Education meeting reviewing areas where we might
reduce or eliminate spending.
Though the items reviewed do not comprise a comprehensive list, they do
provide a more global look at the district. For each item or scenario reviewed, Board of Education
members provided feedback and comments.
I will use this information, as well as input from administration,
teachers, and other district personnel, to produce my superintendentÕs
recommended budget. That budget
will be reviewed at the March 1, 2010, Board of Education meeting.
As I have traveled around the
district this week, I have had a number of questions asked by staff including:
Q: Will we need to reduce or
cut personnel?
A: While
I hope that we are able to make reductions through attrition and retirements,
it will not be feasible to close the budget gap (as we now know it) solely by
this means. While we gather
information and work through the budget development process, every effort will
be made to ensure we continue our high-quality programs for students. Any reductions or eliminations in personnel
will be spread across the district as evenly as possible.
Q; Will
we need to cut programs or reduce services to children?
A: Unfortunately,
as we work to close the budget gap, we will have to evaluate our programs and
services to students with an eye toward possible reductions. A large budget gap may result in the
reduction or elimination of programs or services such as extracurricular
activities, field trips, and professional development for staff, athletics,
some programs for struggling students, and opportunities for enrichment. Again, my goal would be to spread any
reductions or eliminations as evenly as possible across the district.
Q: Is
it possible class sizes could increase?
A: If
you review the PowerPoint I used Monday evening (www.scotiaglenvilleschools.org),
you will note that increases in class size across all levels is being looked at
as a possible strategy for reducing costs. That said, the district remains committed to reasonable
class sizes at all levels, but particularly at the primary level.
Q: What other areas are being
considered for reductions or elimination?
A: Again, I
encourage you to look at the districtÕs website and review Monday eveningÕs
PowerPoint. In addition to
personnel and instructional programs, reductions are being considered in
support services, transportation, maintenance, and administration. I have also met with the Presidents of
each of the bargaining units not currently negotiating and asked them to
consider unit concessions. You
should be hearing more about this from your union leadership.
Q: What
if I have an idea for cost savings?
A: The
challenges we will face over the next several months will not be easily
resolved. I would welcome any ideas
or thoughts you may have about possible cost savings measures. Please feel free to drop me a note or
e-mail.
It
is important that you understand my first goal in budget development is to
construct a budget that provides for the needs and growth of all Scotia-Glenville
students while recognizing the difficulties many in our community are facing. The purpose of this letter is not to
cause panicÉÉactually, just the opposite.
I want to provide you with accurate information about where we are in
the budget process, where you can find updated information (our website), and
the challenges we are currently facing.
I
do expect that further questions will arise. If you have questions, I encourage you to speak with your
school principal, department administrator, director or me. In addition, I will provide periodic
updates, like this one, as our work continues.